OPENMFM
Patient guide · Pregnancy after loss

Your history is the map for this pregnancy

The number of losses matters. The story of each loss tells us more.

ListenRebuild each pregnancy timeline
Find the patternSeparate early, cervical, placental, genetic, and unexplained pathways
Build your planChoose care that matches your history

OpenMFM patient education · Evidence reviewed September 1, 2026

Start with the definition

Definitions differ. Care should not wait.

2+

ACOG and ASRM

Recurrent pregnancy loss is two or more pregnancy losses. ASRM includes pregnancies confirmed by urine or blood testing, not only ultrasound.

3+

Some international guidance

RCOG uses three or more early miscarriages, while allowing evaluation sooner when the pattern raises concern.

After two losses, ask for a structured review of your history and prior testing.
Release the blame

Most miscarriages are not caused by something you did

Not
your fault.
ordinary exerciseworksexstressan argument

Many early losses happen because of a chance chromosome difference in the pregnancy.

Timing changes the questions

One pregnancy timeline can reveal different pathways

Positive test onlyVery early or biochemical loss
Early ultrasound lossLocation, heartbeat, and chromosomes may matter
Painless opening / PPROMReview the cervix and preterm-birth pathway
Placental diseasePreeclampsia, growth restriction, or abruption
Later fetal deathPlacenta, genetics, infection, and maternal disease review

These experiences may share the word “loss,” but they do not automatically share the same cause or care plan.

Build the phenotype

For each loss, gather the same eight facts

01DateYear or approximate date
02Gestational ageHow many weeks?
03LocationWas it seen inside the uterus?
04HeartbeatWas cardiac activity documented?
05PatternBleeding, missed loss, painless dilation, PPROM, or placental disease
06ManagementPassed naturally, medication, procedure, or delivery
07TestingPathology, chromosome, or placental results
08ContextConception method, partner, and fetal findings
Open the Visit History Builder →
Records beat recollection

Bring the records that can change the plan

One organized
pregnancy history
Ultrasound and emergency reports
Procedure and operative notes
Pregnancy-tissue chromosome results
Placental pathology
APS laboratory results with dates
Uterine imaging and prior consultation notes

Getting the original results can prevent duplicate testing and incorrect assumptions.

Test with a purpose

The evaluation is targeted, not an “everything panel”

Can change care

Pregnancy-tissue chromosome testingClarifies whether aneuploidy explains a loss
Uterine-cavity evaluationSaline ultrasound, HSG, hysteroscopy, or selected imaging
APS antibodiesWhen the clinical history meets testing criteria
TSH and A1cWhen history, symptoms, risk factors, or tissue results support testing
Parental chromosomesSelected situations, especially structural rearrangement or absent tissue testing

Not routine RPL testing

Inherited thrombophilia panelsNot recommended without a separate clot-risk indication
Broad immune testingANA, NK-cell, HLA, and similar panels do not define standard RPL care
Microbiome add-onsNot established as routine evaluation
Endometrial receptivity testingDoes not explain most recurrent losses
Ovarian reserve testingNot routinely recommended for RPL alone
Antiphospholipid syndrome

APS matters because a confirmed diagnosis changes treatment

Key 1

Clinical history

Specific pregnancy complications or a personal thrombosis history

Key 2

Persistent antibodies

The correct antibody panel, confirmed over time when positive

Specialist treatment pathway

Confirmed obstetric APS may be treated with low-dose aspirin plus heparin during pregnancy.

Empiric anticoagulation does not improve unexplained RPL.

Treat what is real and actionable

Thyroid disease and diabetes matter when they are present

Thyroid

Overt hypothyroidism should be treated. Testing is guided by the loss history, symptoms, prior tissue results, and clinical risk.

Glucose

Uncontrolled diabetes increases pregnancy risk. A1c or early glucose review is targeted to people with diabetes or relevant risk factors.

The goal is control of a documented condition, not treatment of a laboratory label in isolation.

A different pathway

Painless second-trimester loss needs a cervical-history review

History signal

Painless opening, PPROM, or prior cervical procedure

Tell your team exactly what happened and whether contractions or infection were present.

12–14 weeks

History-based discussion

A classic history may lead to a planned cerclage discussion.

16–24 weeks

Cervical-length pathway

Other histories may lead to serial transvaginal cervical-length measurement.

If shortened

Individualized action

Progesterone, cerclage, or continued observation depends on history, length, dilation, and pregnancy type.

Important:

A second-trimester loss is not automatically cervical insufficiency. The clinical pattern matters.

The first weeks

Early care should confirm location, dating, and viability

01

Inside the uterus?

Early ultrasound helps confirm location and assess ectopic-pregnancy risk.

02

How far along?

Reliable dating makes every later comparison more meaningful.

03

What can we see today?

Follow-up timing should allow enough interval for a clear answer and avoid premature conclusions.

A planned reassurance schedule should reduce uncertainty, not create a cycle of scans that are too early to interpret.
Pregnancy after loss is emotionally different

Support is a component of care, not an extra

You and this pregnancy
Clear scan plan
MFM access
Mental-health support
Partner / support person
Call and warning-sign plan

Anxiety, grief, sleep disruption, and prior-loss trauma deserve direct screening and a named support plan.

Right patient · Right moment

Progesterone helps a specific group, not everyone

Prior miscarriage

One or more previous losses

Bleeding now

Bleeding in the current early pregnancy, with clinician and ultrasound review

At this intersection: vaginal micronized progesterone may be offered or considered under the selected guideline.

Routine progesterone has not shown benefit for every patient with asymptomatic unexplained RPL.

Medication needs an indication

Aspirin and heparin are not universal miscarriage treatments

Aspirin + heparin

This combination is used for confirmed APS under specialist care.

Indication: a defined APS pathway

Low-dose aspirin alone

May be recommended for preeclampsia prevention when standard high-risk or combined moderate-risk factors are present.

Indication: preeclampsia-risk criteria
Recurrent loss alone is not a reason to self-start aspirin, heparin, or LMWH.
Build care in modules

Later monitoring follows the risks you actually have

Base for every pregnancy: routine prenatal visits + anatomy ultrasound + symptom education
Add modules when the history or current pregnancy provides a reason ↓
Cervical lengthCervical or spontaneous-preterm-birth pathway
Growth scansAPS, hypertension, diabetes, prior FGR, or current concern
DopplerWhen fetal growth restriction or placental disease is present
NST / BPPWhen maternal or fetal risk meets testing criteria
Delivery timingDriven by current maternal and fetal indications
Unexplained RPL alone does not automatically require every test or early delivery.
Save or print this slide

Questions to ask your MFM specialist

1What pattern do you see across my prior losses?
2Which original records should we obtain?
3Which parts of an RPL evaluation are complete, and what would still change care?
4What is our early ultrasound and reassurance plan?
5Does my history support APS, cervical, genetic, uterine, thyroid, or diabetes evaluation?
6Why is each medication recommended for me?
7What symptoms should prompt an urgent call or emergency evaluation?
8What later monitoring will be added, and what specific risk triggers it?
9How can I reach the team when anxiety or symptoms escalate?
10What mental-health or pregnancy-loss support is available?
Prepare your visit summary →
What to remember

Your plan should be specific, evidence-based, and kind

Your story
Your pattern
Your care plan

More than half of recurrent loss remains unexplained. Even then, future live birth is common, and care can still be purposeful.

Known

  • History phenotype guides evaluation.
  • Confirmed APS, overt thyroid disease, and uncontrolled diabetes change treatment.
  • Support belongs in care.

Uncertain

  • The cause of many losses
  • The best scan frequency for every patient
  • Benefit of several add-on tests and treatments

Individualized

  • Early reassurance schedule
  • Cervical and placental surveillance
  • Medication and delivery planning
Educational disclaimer. This presentation supports informed discussion. It does not diagnose a cause, prescribe treatment, or replace care from your obstetric and MFM team.
Privacy. No patient information is collected by this deck. Examples are general and contain no protected health information.
← OpenMFM Library